A dirty word that's not a dirty word at all: 'transitional'


On a single night in January last year, 86,352 people had no home to go to in New York. Only California was higher with 118,142.

But that study from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, offered a huge ray of hope: Of those tens of thousands of people, only 3,500 of them — 4.2 percent — didn’t have some place to stay.

It was one of the best sheltering rates in the country. Somehow, the great people of New York found a roof, blankets and maybe even a meal for 82,000 people. 

That’s extraordinary. But it’s not enough. 

Last week’s land use committee meeting seemed to create a consensus among members of Community Board 8: Make the shelter at 5731 Broadway permanent housing for homeless families, or don’t do it at all.

The word “transitional” just won’t fly for them, even after city homeless services deputy commissioner Jackie Bray explained the average stay in such transitional housing was one year. And one year, by the way, is a typical length for a lease — something one might have expected in a market-rate apartment.

CB8 would have you believe the city should just pay for a family to have housing until the end of time. But that doesn’t work — and for good reason.

First, there are new people coming into the system all the time, seeking help, and a home. If DHS were handing out free apartments for life, where would that end? What would the cost be to taxpayers then?

Second, the goal for services provided by agencies like DHS is not to give hand-outs — it’s to lend a hand, to get these members of our community back on their feet. And even better, to help them become independent.

Not a single CB8 member last Thursday asked where these families go once they transition out of such facilities. While some may end up caught back in the system, many more are able to secure their own apartments and get back on their feet. 

Isn’t that what we, as a community and a humane society, want? To follow the old adage of teaching a man how to fish? This is a system to help struggling families regain their independence. And we need to stop considering “transitional” such a terrible word ... it isn’t.

One other thing really concerned us about Thursday’s meeting. Land use committee chair Charles Moerdler is a well-respected member of this community, and his bulldog attitude toward developers — who might not always have the best interests of this community at heart — is something rightfully celebrated.

However, that approach can’t then extend to the very community he was appointed to represent.

The board has unlimited time to speak and share opinions. The community does not. So when it’s time for the community to speak, that means it’s time for the board — especially the chair — to not. 

Public comment isn’t a debate, it isn’t a challenge. It’s a time to do something every CB8 member must do — Listen.

We respect CB8 leadership, but those leaders need to respect the community.


2 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
Democrap 4 life

"Second, the goal for services provided by agencies like DHS is not to give hand-outs — it’s to lend a hand, to get these members of our community back on their feet. And even better, to help them become independent."

One would think after seeing three generations on welfare that possibly the system is flawed?

As long as section 8 is handed out with food stamps and free medical we democratics will always be the task masters and have those who "meed a helping hand" remain captive and we will continue to keep it status quo as long as they keep our leadership in power

As a matter of fact the left coast is importing illegal's in and trying to give them the right to vote in our elections

Friday, August 18
Jack Ira Warshaw

Today, the progressive ultra-left has decided that individual responsibility is no more, and that the state will provide all individuals the benefits of shelter, food and medicine without guilt. However, someone pays for these free services and goods. Moreover, the financial burden are paid for through government officials establishing incomes taxes, sales taxes, real estates taxes, fees, fines and other levies from our working classes. When these fine public legislators run out of taxing and fee generating tools, they borrow monies and defer payment for our future generations. The question I ask myself is "Why do Bill diBlasio not allow one of his his two Park Slope town houses be utilized for the homeless rather than renting them out for $5000 per month?"

Monday, August 21