Point of View

Manhattan College must take control of off-campus students

Posted

How many years, how much destruction, and how much taxpayer-funded cleanup and policing will it take for Manhattan College to claim responsibility for the impact that their growing off-campus population has on the Riverdale and Kingsbridge communities?

I think that the answer is, there is no limit. As long as the school is not pushed to fund security and cleanup, it will be happy to continue to abrogate their responsibility to residents and the 50th Precinct.

It is not my, nor any other resident’s, responsibility to ensure students uphold Manhattan College’s code of conduct. To Manhattan College’s chagrin, I’m sure, the New York Police Department and the city’s sanitation department are also not under their employ, though you would not know this given the college’s reliance on publicly funded services to do their job for them.

If you contact the school about the trash, the drunken rampages, and the total lack of respect regularly seen, you may or may not receive a response from the dean of students. If he does respond, he will eventually stop because somehow it’s an annoying inconvenience that your building or neighborhood is getting trashed and that you routinely wake up on a Friday bleary eyed for work.

I must have missed the memo, but it seems that Thursday is also a weekend night. I should really alert my boss.

The first time the dean responded to my pleas to deal with the student population last year, it was only because I posted an embarrassing video of student behavior publicly. After contacting me to schedule a call, I foolishly removed the video, which resulted in him determining the call was no longer a necessity.

This year, after a brief period of initial responsiveness, again I guess complaints about the ongoing destruction became annoying. Despite claiming to work with residents, he stopped even acknowledging emails. While lamenting the situation with another frustrated pregnant neighbor who could have had a horrible accident as a result of a student prank, we decided to call and leave a voicemail, hoping for a response. 

He never returned her message, or mine.

Riverdale is not a college town. It’s filled with longtime residents, young professionals and families. And if Manhattan College endeavors to bring in more money by adding to the student body, or continues to permit off-campus housing for undergraduates, they also need to increase expenditures to ensure the students treat the neighborhood like a neighborhood — with respect.

Otherwise, they need to reduce class size, or return to being a primarily commuter school.

Students cannot claim to be adults and rally to be treated as such if they are unwilling to take on the responsibilities of adulthood. This includes understanding how to behave in a community.

This entitled and privileged student populace would not, in their parents’ neighborhoods, display the behaviors Riverdale residents typically observe. To students, this is not a community of which they are a part of or share responsibility for. It is a temporary playground that can be trashed and destroyed at will with few real consequences.

I would welcome the opportunity to be proven incorrect about my generalizations, and have given the school the benefit of the doubt in the past. But as Manhattan College refuses to rein in the majority of their most visible and obnoxious ambassadors, there are not other conclusions I can come to.

School administration will lead you to believe that the task at hand is nearly insurmountable, that they can only take action if you, as a resident, risk harassment and bullying by taking close video and photo footage of the misbehavior.

I’ve attempted this approach, and at 5-foot-3, have had male students verbally and physically intimidate me while doing so. Issuing warnings and modest fines to the occasional individuals — the college’s general method of reproach for misconduct off-campus — does not change the school’s well-known party and binge-drinking culture, and does not present a long-term solution.

Fairfield University, when faced with a similar situation, employed assistant directors of resident life to monitor nearby off-campus residences on Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights. Students in off-campus housing must register their addresses, making it easy for security to target particular areas and issue citations for un-neighborly behavior, even if it is not illegal.

The Riverdale community is small, this is a reasonable solution here. Additionally, off-campus students should have a mandatory orientation at the beginning of each school year which could include messages from the 50th Precinct, our local councilman and residents — serious discussions about the consequences of binge-drinking, and clear communication of the ramifications of good neighbor policy violations.

Don’t let Manhattan College fool you. There are real, immediate and effective solutions to student behavior in Riverdale, but the college would prefer that residents — not the school — foot the bill and responsibility for these. 

The efforts of Deputy Inspector Terence O’Toole of the 50th Precinct and Councilman Andrew Cohen have been persistent, but it’s time for Manhattan College to be held accountable and mobilize their own resources to address problems created directly by their students.

Whatever steps have been taken, clearly, have not been enough, and continued dipping into the public coffers is no longer tolerable.

Karolina Janik

Comments

5 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
TruthTeller

While I truly feel for this writer and sympathize greatly, 1980 called and wants its news story back. This is one of the oldest running stories in Riverdale and you will never get relief, especially as the young become even more entitled and narcisisstic than in the past due to their coddling upbringing. You just need to face facts that the college and Police don't care about you.

Friday, November 10
sleeplessinrh

To give up with this attitude that things will never change is the worst thing we can do. Neighborhood residents should never resign themselves to the burden of cleaning up after, and providing a safe playpen for cursing rampaging drunk students who litter the neighborhood with their trash, vomit and urine. Yes, there is no permanent fix, but the good news is it can get better when efforts are sustained on all fronts.

Friday, November 10
TruthTeller

Like I said, I wish you luck and hope you get relief. It must suck dealing with these brats, but this has been a perennial problem for decades and it is very likely it will continue. This is why it is never a good idea to live near this institution.

Saturday, November 11
DMcShane

Blame the 50th. We are not talking about a large area to police. Ticket some drinks, close down the loud parties and crack down on bars or bodega that serve underage adults. The school can't hire security to patrol city streets.

Saturday, November 11
Sympathizer

Campuses are always fraught with unacceptable rowdiness, yes, but that doesn't make it OK. And yes, it's always smart to choose to live further away, and while that's true it's also true that residents have every right to explore avenues until something works. It sounds like Karolina already found the solution to bring attention to the matter, to embarrass the students and the college via social media. Schools do everything they can to avoid bad publicity just like any other business, so if it were me who lived on Waldo and 238th, I would keep the videos and photos coming and hashtag the heck out of the school, the precinct, etc.

Wednesday, November 15