Co-ops needs these protections


To the editor:

(re: “This new co-op law couldn’t hurt,” Jan. 9)

From his recent letter, it appears Zachary Berman does not really understand co-operative housing.

That is not surprising. Many people — including co-op members — do not understand co-ops.

He says, “co-op shareholders are essentially tenants with equity and mortgage bills.” A better description would be tenants who own the buildings they live in. They are tenant-owners. The idea that there is a conflict of interest between the co-op and its shareholders is like saying there is a conflict of interest between the cells of a body and the body as a whole. It does not make sense.

The Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act was written to protect renters from unscrupulous landlords. The relationship of a co-operative and its members is very different.

The vast majority of co-op members do the right thing. They pay their bills on time and don’t bother their neighbors. It is only a small percent that create problems for the co-operative. Whether it is application fees or late fees, legal bills or certified mail, any increase in a co-op’s cost is a cost for all the people who live there.

The new law protects the few difficult people, and places a burden on the people who do the right thing. Government should not be doing that. The distinctions are clear.

Ed Yaker

Have an opinion? Share your thoughts as a letter to the editor. Make your submission to letters@riverdalepress.com. Please include your full name, phone number (for verification purposes only), and home address (which will not be published).
Ed Yaker,