EDITORIAL

The price of a cup of coffee

Posted

In the 1980s, a cup of coffee cost 70 cents. That’s something few older people have to look up, thanks not to great memory, but instead to Sally Struthers and her Christian Children’s Fund commercials.

The idea was that for the price of a cup of coffee, a child in a famine-plagued country somewhere could get the nourishing meal she needs.

Coffee is a little more expensive in 2021, closer to $3. Yet, believe it or not, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can provide a nourishing meal for someone down on their luck much closer to home, according to Feeding America.

If one person could get three meals a day for less than $10, that means 10 could eat for just $100. And 100 could eat for $1,000.

We have great organizations here in New York City to help get food to those in need, but it’s not nearly enough. As you read this, someone is going hungry — and they may be closer than you think.

Imagine what $500,000 could do. That could pay for 166,000 meals — enough to feed 150 people all year. It could do many other things as well, like pay for more than 100 students to attend a CUNY undergraduate program for a year. It could pay a month’s rent for 400 people. It could let 5,000 people visit a doctor.

But here in our neighborhood — like many others — $500,000 has been given by our taxpayers to four people running for city council.

There’s nothing wrong with the campaign financing matching program. It provides parity where it might not exist otherwise, and gives so many candidates a chance to win a seat they might not otherwise.

This is obvious to everyone, it seems, except those running for this council seat. Jessica Haller and Eric Dinowitz already have spent $178,000 on their campaign. Yet, only $18,000 stayed in the Bronx. That’s terrible.

Other candidates receiving matching funds — Mino Lora and Dan Padernacht — do better locally, but there’s room for further improvement.

The only one who seems to get local spending is Carlton Berkley, who has spent nearly every dollar locally. And he doesn’t even qualify for matching funds.

Candidates can spend their money how they want. But voters are watching. And if you aren’t taking care of our community now, how can we trust you’ll take care of our community when elected?

Have an opinion? Share your thoughts as a letter to the editor. Make your submission to letters@riverdalepress.com. Please include your full name, phone number (for verification purposes only), and home address (which will not be published). The Riverdale Press maintains an open submission policy, and stated opinions do not necessarily represent the publication.

Comments